Posted by acehai on August 27, 19100 at 16:17:40:
In Reply to: Is Donaldson's Investigation Really "Independent"? posted by A Concerned Citizen on August 26, 19100 at 09:29:57:
Donaldsons excellence in "independent investigation" is negated by his utter refusal to entertain the heretical notion that his Beloved Navy was responsible for the deaths of 230 innocent men, women, and (yes, mr. clinton)children.
This refusal in the face of overwhealming documentation of "significant naval units" can only be read one way. And Michael Hull, by your defense of dis-information, you have cast yourself as a disinformationalist also.
The "terrorist" scenario only works as a backup position in case the "magic fuel tank explosion ignited by a phantom spark" insanity falls apart.
Read Jim Sanders Altered Evidence for the perpetrators, and click on the optional link to understand Donaldsons Independent Investigation.