August 22, 2000
TWA Flight 800 Crash Still a
WASHINGTON –– Four years after an explosion destroyed TWA Flight
killed all 230 aboard, federal investigators are taking what they hope
will be a
final look into the mystery of what happened.
The National Transportation Safety Board opens a two-day meeting Tuesday
review the evidence collected in its investigation.
Speculation has ranged from a spark caused by electrical wiring, to
caused by another aircraft, bombs, even a missile. There has even been
suggestion that the answer may never be known.
What has become apparent in the long, costly probe is the Boeing 747
destroyed by an explosion that originated in its central fuel tank
on July 17, 1996,
shortly after takeoff on a New York to Paris flight.
Even without knowing what ignited the Flight 800 blast, the investigation
led to extensive changes in design and regulation that are expected
safety in the years to come.
Shortly after the crash, investigators determined that the plane's almost-empty
center fuel tank exploded, but they have not settled on the source
One possibility that has been widely discussed is electrical wiring
near or through the fuel tank.
The plane had spent considerable time waiting for takeoff on the runway,
air conditioners located beneath the fuel tank could have caused it
Since the focus shifted toward the fuel tank, the Federal Aviation
Administration has ordered 37 corrective actions for commercial airliners.
Among them are
replacing sharp-edged fuel probes that might damage wires, keeping
unless they are submerged in fuel, installing protective sleeves on
tanks and developing electronic devices to suppress power surges in
Beth Erickson, head of aircraft certification for the FAA, said the
reviewed the history of fuel tanks on 10,000 commercial and noncombat
planes and found few problems.
Industry also participated, reporting a week ago that a three-year study
concluded airline fuel tanks are safe.
The Air Transport Association, the airline industry's trade association,
more than 100,000 work hours were spent inspecting 990 aircraft operated
airlines as part of the program.
Erickson said the FAA determined that three factors are needed for a
explosion: flammable vapors, oxygen and an ignition source.
Changes are being made in all three areas: eliminating sparks; inerting,
filling the empty area of fuel tanks with nitrogen rather than allowing
that contains potentially flammable oxygen; reducing vapors by keeping
fuller; cooling fuel tanks; and changing fuel formulas.
Early in the investigation the possibility of a bomb led the government
tighten security procedures. Investigators have not reported evidence
explosives, either from a bomb or a missile.
Eyewitness reports of streaks of light seen nearby on the night of the
have continued to plague investigators and to fuel conspiracy theories.
the NTSB to go so far as to test-fire missiles to determine just what
might have been able to see on the night of the crash.
This month a group of skeptics in Springfield, Mass., sued the government
seeking details of its inquiry into the crash, including radar data
on material found with some of the victims' bodies.
Retired Navy pilot William Donaldson, a vocal critic of the investigation,
Home - Last Updated:
issued a statement Monday contending that the government is determined
to cover up
the cause of the crash.