Flight 800: Accident Or Terrorist
Attack? Part 7
Newsletter AIMs To Rein In The Media
Christine Moeser for
Suffolk Life Newspapers
December 18, 1998
The majority of financial backing for a study, claiming TWA
Flight 800 was likely destroyed by a missile, comes from the
sometimes controversial group, Accuracy in Media (AIM). AIM
centers around the beliefs of its founder, Reed Irvine, an
economist who at one point worked for the federal government. Its
headquarters is located in an office building suite in
Washington, D.C. According to Irvine, it is continuously
searching for the inaccuracies and misinformation that many news
organizations have reported, helping to distort the truth and
ignore their obligation to include all the facts.
"Many times, journalists report on issues incorrectly,"
Irvine stated. For the past 29 years, "Its our job here to
bring these facts to light." Twice a month, he publishes a
newsletter called the AIM Report, which is distributed to 1,000
readers who pay a $15 per year membership fee. While he admits
members rarely include media professionals, he characterizes a
typical AIM reader as highly intelligent and having a vast
interest in current events. "Because we dont write down to
readers, and the articles tend to be lengthy, subscribers must
have a serious commitment to the world around us," Irvine
said. "I couldnšt see an unintelligent hermit reading our
reports." FLIGHT 800 JUST ONE ISSUE While he attempts to
cover a wide range of issues, he plans to update this past Junes
newsletter, which criticized the medias coverage of the
investigation of TWA Flight 800.
Specifically referring to ABCs "PrimeTime Live" program
entitled "The Mystery of Flight 800," Irvine accused
the media of having a passive approach, and "helping the
government try to convince the public that the cause of the
tragedy was some unexplained flaw in the Boeing 747." During
the program, Bernard Loeb, director of Aviation Safety of the
National Transportation Safety Board, said Flight 800 was
destroyed by an explosion in its nearly empty center wing fuel
tank. What PrimeTime failed to report, Irvine says, is the
evidence Commander William Donaldson has produced proving this
theory to be wrong. Donaldson is a retired Navy attack pilot who
spent most of his career as a crash investigator. He is an AIM
member who has been conducting an independent investigation,
which is funded by AIM. The result of Donaldsonšs on-going
investigation alludes to one or more missiles causing the plane
to go down, and a possible FBI cover-up. "Journalists who
have accepted the official claims that there is no evidence that
a missile downed FL800 have not critically examined the
evidence," Irvine wrote in his newsletter.
"There are no test results that support the NTSB
hypothesis." FROM A RADICAL TO A WATCHDOG Once a
"radical," he said the main purpose of AIM is to
correct inaccuracies within the media, and to ensure the public
is informed from all sides. He formed the organization because of
his irritation with the misinformation within newspapers and
television news programs. As an economist with the Federal
Reserve System in Washington, Irvine joined a luncheon club where
conservatives would gather and discuss current affairs. From
those conversations, he saw a need to form an organization whose
main objective would be to keep mainstream media in line. In
1969, with the help of a millionaire friend, AIM was founded.
"We felt the media was misbehaving and causing a lot of
grief," he recalls. "By 1972, we began printing a
newsletter focusing on factual errors made throughout the
media." The organization grew and became more vocal in the
intervening years. Many journalists and editors have criticized
Irvine, accusing him of using AIM as a way to channel his own
philosophical and conservative beliefs.
CRITICIZED JOURNALISTS DEFEND THEMSELVES
Sydney Schanberg, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of
Cambodia when he was a correspondent for the New York Times,
accused Irvine in a Newsday interview of publishing fabricated,
distorted accounts of that coverage. Irvine claimed he was being
"soft on communism." "Išve considered what he
did, with respect to my work, scurrilous," Schanberg said.
"Išve never seen any document or statement of his where the
facts were accurate. The very name Accuracy in Media is a
misnomer.
Itšs not about accuracy, and itšs not about the media. Its
about ideology." Irvine critiqued another New York Times
reporter in his newsletter, by saying Raymond Bonneršs coverage
of Central America was supporting communism. He described his
articles as "worth a division to the communists in Central
America."
While Bonner was reassigned to the metropolitan desk not long
after Irvinešs claim, he denied in various news interviews his
new position was prompted by AIMšs diatribe. "The point is
that here is somebody who purports to monitor the press,"
Bonner stated. "But as far as I know, he never calls anyone
for comment. I think he is irresponsible." To his critics,
Irvine says his only interest is in correcting factual errors,
and he will call upon any journalist who does not do the same.
Emphasizing the publics right to be informed, he believes it is
the Medias job to present all the facts in an unbiased format.
Unlike fiction writers, journalists should not pick and choose
facts as they see fit. "Everyone, even those in the media,
are entitled to their opinions," Irvine said. "But when
youšre reporting to the public, the coverage should remain
untainted, so that the public can judge for themselves."
Reprinted with the permission of Suffolk Life
NewspapersRiverhead, New York Tel: 516-369-0800