Posted by stan clark on September 26, 19100 at 03:27:28:
In Reply to: Re: I Know The Missile Huggers Will Hate To Hear It But This Will Hopefully Be My Last Posting Here posted by Trevor on September 25, 19100 at 04:11:28:
: >>Trevor, this may be a better approach than your idea of taking the individual theories one by one.<<
: Rick,
: It's okay, I can deal with rejection... Trevor, my comment was intended to be supportive of your approach - not the opposite. Rick's 36 allegations provide an instant data bank which can be sorted into the various theories. Most relate to missiles. It will take a multitiered approach in any event. The first cut is random spark (and all other theories) v. missiles. This is followed by navy v. foe missile(s). random spark v. all other non-missile theories. Then lower down is how many missiles? explosive v. inert and so on. Perhaps a logic diagram would make things clearer. Logic is a new concept which has not been applied by any of us yet on TWA 800. I don't know what it is either, but it has something to do with reasoning. And true and false quizes.