Posted by Not a fan on August 30, 19100 at 20:22:41:
In Reply to: Can you PROVE your accusations about Elmer posted by ??????? on August 29, 19100 at 20:06:20:
Though not a fan of the infamous Elmer or his theory, he has been proven to be as right as the rest of you. What makes the two sides different is that the "investigators" could have made a better case. Instead they aligned the two groups with differing theories (i hope) and one was dragged down with and by the other. Tough to prove a fleet of two bad guys when you can't prove a fleet of 30 or so good guys.
If i understand the Donaldson theory, two projectiles were fired over the head of the Adak or was the Adak doing 30 knots? Did you prove the Adak was even there? Did the official investigation contain statemnets from them? If they are like the Navy, don't they have a lookout? Don't they plot targets? Donaldson found one fishing boat captain who saw the incident and mistakingly paraded him to a live event. I am sure that 30 unidentified targets contained more! They put out fliers with a picture of a yet unidentified winglike structure, Did the investigation identify it?
If you havent had enough, drop your expert verses expert investigation and reduce it to the basics. You lost on physics and only 1 family member and a grandstanding reporter even cared to show up to the rebuttle. I expected to see at least one of your outraged eyewitnesses. Wait a minute, whose forum is this anyway?